4.5 Article

Behavior of direct reduced iron and hot briquetted iron in the upper blast furnace shaft: Part I. Fundamentals of kinetics and mechanism of oxidation

Publisher

MINERALS METALS MATERIALS SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-006-0055-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is considered that the use of prereduced ferrous materials and sources of metallic iron such as direct reduced iron (DRI) or hot briquetted iron (HBI) improves the productivity of the blast furnace (BF). However, oxidation of DRI/HBI can occur in the upper zone of the BF, which may increase the content of the reducing gases but may not decrease the coke rate substantially. The behavior of DRI and HBI was investigated by measuring the rate of oxidation of the materials in CO2 gas in a temperature range of 400 degrees C to 900 degrees C. In addition, the microstructure of as-received and oxidized materials was examined. The iron oxide phases formed due to oxidation were determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and a vibrating sample magnetometer. The results of isothermal experiments indicated that the kinetics of oxidation of metallic iron is slow at 400 degrees C. In DRI samples, the initial rate is controlled by the limited mixed control of chemical kinetics at the iron/iron oxide interface and pore mass transfer, whereas gas diffusion in pores is the rate governing step during the final stages of oxidation. The oxidation of wustite from iron is found to be faster than the oxidation of the former to magnetite. The structure of DRI after oxidation resembled a reverse topochemical-oxide on the surface metal in the center structure at 600 degrees C to 700 degrees C. The final iron oxide phase formed in DRI after oxidation was magnetite and not hematite. The oxidation of HBI was limited to the surface of the samples at lower temperatures; at 900 degrees C, moderate oxidation was observed and a topochemical iron oxide layer was formed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available