4.5 Article

The Biaxial Biomechanical Behavior of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Tissue

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 2440-2450

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1106-5

Keywords

Mechanical properties; AAA; Anisotropy

Funding

  1. Irish Research Council 'EMBARK Initiative' [IDRS/2010/2941]
  2. University of Western Australia Research Fellowship
  3. NHMRC [APP1063986]
  4. Irish Government's Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions Cycle 5
  5. European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rupture of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) occurs when the local wall stress exceeds the local wall strength. Knowledge of AAA wall mechanics plays a fundamental role in the development and advancement of AAA rupture risk assessment tools. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the biaxial mechanical properties of AAA tissue. Multiple biaxial test protocols were performed on AAA samples harvested from 28 patients undergoing open surgical repair. Both the Tangential Modulus (TM) and stretch ratio (lambda) were recorded and compared in both the circumferential (I ') and longitudinal (L) directions at physiologically relevant stress levels, the influence of patient specific factors such as sex, age AAA diameter and status were examined. The biomechanical response was also fit to a hyperplastic material model. The AAA tissue was found to be anisotropic with a greater tendency to stiffen in the circumferential direction compared to the longitudinal direction. An anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model represented the data well and the properties were not influenced by the investigated patient specific factors however, a future study utilizing a larger cohort of patients is warranted to confirm these findings. This work provides further insights on the biomechanical behavior of AAA and may be useful in the development of more reliable rupture risk assessment tools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available