4.6 Article

Face recognition subject to variations in facial expression, illumination and pose using correlation filters

Journal

COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 1-15

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2006.06.004

Keywords

correlation filter; recognition; verification; energy peak; face recognition; phase-only

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we have selected some recent advanced correlation filters: minimum average correlation filter (MACE), unconstrained MACE filter (UMACE), phase-only unconstrained MACE filter (POUMACE), distance-classifier correlation filter (DCCF) [B.V.K. Vijaya Kumar, D. Casasent, A. Mahalanobis, Distance-classifier correlation filters for multiclass target recognition. Appl. Opt. 35 (1996) 3127-3133] and minimax distance transform correlation filter (MDTC) and used them to test recognition performance in different situations involving variations in facial expression, illumination conditions and head pose. The paper introduces the first application of correlation filter classifiers to facial images subject to head pose variations. It also demonstrates that it is possible to obtain illumination invariance without using any training images for this purpose. A comparison of MDTC with traditional discriminant learning methods (e.g., KPCA [Scholikopf, B., Smola, A., Muller, K.R., Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comput., 10 (1999) 1299-1319], IPCA [16], GDA [Baudat, G., Anouar, F., Generalized discriminant analysis using a kernel approach. Neural Comput., 12 (2000) 2385 2404], R-KDA [Lu, J., Plataniotis, K., Venetsanopoulos, A. Regularization studies of linear discriminant analysis in small sample size scenarios with application to face recognition. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 26(2) (2005) 181-191]) is also presented. The paper shows that correlation filter classifiers, a relatively unheralded model-based approach, have a greater robustness and accuracy than traditional appearance-based methods (such as PCA). Overall, the POUMACE filter provided the best choice for facial matching. It achieved 100% accuracy on the publicly available CMU facial expression database and the Yale frontal face illumination database, and slightly less in the head pose experiments. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available