4.5 Article

Effect of chronic hypoglycaemia on glucose concentration and glycogen content in rat brain:: a localized 13C NMR study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 260-268

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04115.x

Keywords

chronic hypoglycaemia; glucose content; glucose transport kinetics; glycogen; localized C-13 magnetic resonance sprectroscopy; rat brain

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR08079, P41 RR008079] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS042005, R01 NS42005] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While chronic hypoglycaemia has been reported to increase unidirectional glucose transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and to increase GLUT1 expression at the endothelium, the effect on steady-state brain D-glucose and brain glycogen content is currently unknown. Brain glucose and glycogen concentrations were directly measured in vivo using localized C-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) following 12-14 days of hypoglycaemia. Brain glucose content was significantly increased by 48%, which is consistent with an increase in the maximal glucose transport rate, T-max, by 58% compared with the sham-treated animals. The localized C-13 NMR measurements of brain glucose were directly validated by comparison with biochemically determined brain glucose content after rapid focused microwave fixation (1.4 s at 4 kW). Both in vivo MRS and biochemical measurements implied that brain glycogen content was not affected by chronic hypoglycaemia, consistent with brain glucose being a major factor controlling brain glycogen content. We conclude that the increased glucose transporter expression in chronic hypoglycaemia leads to increased brain glucose content at a given level of glycaemia. Such increased brain glucose concentrations can result in a lowered glycaemic threshold of counter-regulation observed in chronic hypoglycaemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available