4.6 Article

Can one estimate the conditional distribution of post-model-selection estimators?

Journal

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 2554-2591

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/009053606000000821

Keywords

inference after model selection; post-model-selection estimator; pre-test estimator; selection of regressors; Akaike's information criterion AIC; thresholding; model uncertainty; consistency; uniform consistency; lower risk bound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider the problem of estimating the conditional distribution of a post-model-selection estimator where the conditioning is on the selected model. The notion of a post-model-selection estimator here refers to the combined procedure resulting from first selecting a model (e.g., by a model selection criterion such as AIC or by a hypothesis testing procedure) and then estimating the parameters in the selected model (e.g., by least-squares or maximum likelihood), all based on the same data set. We show that it is impossible to estimate this distribution with reasonable accuracy even asymptotically. In particular, we show that no estimator for this distribution can be uniformly consistent (not even locally). This follows as a corollary to (local) minimax lower bounds on the performance of estimators for this distribution. Similar impossibility results are also obtained for the conditional distribution of linear functions (e.g., predictors) of the post-model-selection estimator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available