4.5 Article

Adhesive/Dentin Interface: The Weak Link in the Composite Restoration

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 1989-2003

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-9969-6

Keywords

Adhesive/dentin interfacial bond; Structure; Physico-chemical stresses; Bonding durability; Adhesive development

Funding

  1. NIDCR [DE14392, K23DE/HD00468]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [K23DE000468, R01DE014392] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Results from clinical studies suggest that more than half of the 166 million dental restorations that were placed in the United States in 2005 were replacements for failed restorations. This emphasis on replacement therapy is expected to grow as dentists use composite as opposed to dental amalgam to restore moderate to large posterior lesions. Composite restorations have higher failure rates, more recurrent caries, and increased frequency of replacement as compared to amalgam. Penetration of bacterial enzymes, oral fluids, and bacteria into the crevices between the tooth and composite undermines the restoration and leads to recurrent decay and premature failure. Under in vivo conditions the bond formed at the adhesive/dentin interface can be the first defense against these noxious, damaging substances. The intent of this article is to review structural aspects of the clinical substrate that impact bond formation at the adhesive/dentin interface; to examine physico-chemical factors that affect the integrity and durability of the adhesive/dentin interfacial bond; and to explore how these factors act synergistically with mechanical forces to undermine the composite restoration. The article will examine the various avenues that have been pursued to address these problems and it will explore how alterations in material chemistry could address the detrimental impact of physico-chemical stresses on the bond formed at the adhesive/dentin interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available