4.5 Article

The Effects of Concentric Ring Electrode Electrical Stimulation on Rat Skin

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 1111-1118

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9891-y

Keywords

Noninvasive electrical stimulation; Transcutaneous electrical stimulation; Electrical-thermal coupled field analysis; Infrared thermography

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS061335] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R21 NS061335, R21 NS061335-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface electrodes are commonly used electrodes clinically, in applications such as functional electrical stimulation for the restoration of motor functions, pain relief, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electrocardiographic monitoring, defibrillation, surface cardiac pacing, and advanced drug delivery systems. Common to these applications are occasional reports of pain, tissue damage, rash, or burns on the skin at the point where electrodes are placed. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the effects of acute noninvasive electrical stimulation from concentric ring electrodes (CRE) to determine the maximum safe current limit. We developed a three-dimensional multi-layer model and calculated the temperature profile under the CRE and the corresponding energy density with electrical-thermal coupled field analysis. Infrared thermography was used to measure skin temperature during electrical stimulation to verify the computer simulations. We also performed histological analysis to study cell morphology and characterize any resulting tissue damage. The simulation results are accurate for low energy density distributions. It can also be concluded that as long as the specified energy density applied is kept below 0.92 (A(2)/cm(4)center dot s(-1)), the maximum temperature will remain within the safe limits. Future work should focus on the effects of the electrode paste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available