4.5 Article

Numerical Investigation of the Performance of Three Hinge Designs of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves

Journal

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 38, Issue 11, Pages 3295-3310

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0086-3

Keywords

Pulsatile numerical simulations; Fluid mechanics; Pivot; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Physiologic conditions; Design parameters; Optimization; Prosthetic heart valve

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [R01-HL-070262]
  2. Minnesota Supercomputing Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thromboembolic complications (TECs) of bileaflet mechanical heart valves (BMHVs) are believed to be due to the nonphysiologic mechanical stresses imposed on blood elements by the hinge flows. Relating hinge flow features to design features is, therefore, essential to ultimately design BMHVs with lower TEC rates. This study aims at simulating the pulsatile three-dimensional hinge flows of three BMHVs and estimating the TEC potential associated with each hinge design. Hinge geometries are constructed from micro-computed tomography scans of BMHVs. Simulations are conducted using a Cartesian sharp-interface immersed-boundary methodology combined with a second-order accurate fractional-step method. Leaflet motion and flow boundary conditions are extracted from fluid-structure-interaction simulations of BMHV bulk flow. The numerical results are analyzed using a particle-tracking approach coupled with existing blood damage models. The gap width and, more importantly, the shape of the recess and leaflet are found to impact the flow distribution and TEC potential. Smooth, streamlined surfaces appear to be more favorable than sharp corners or sudden shape transitions. The developed framework will enable pragmatic and cost-efficient preclinical evaluation of BMHV prototypes prior to valve manufacturing. Application to a wide range of hinges with varying design parameters will eventually help in determining the optimal hinge design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available