4.8 Article

Massively parallel sample preparation for the MALDI MS analyses of tissues

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 78, Issue 19, Pages 6826-6832

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac060652r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [1F32AA014459, F32 AA014459] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [P30 DA018310, P30 DA018310-01, DA017940, P30 DA018310-02, P30DA018310] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigation of the peptidome of the nervous system containing large, often easily identifiable neurons has greatly benefited from single-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry and has led to the discovery of hundreds of novel cell-to-cell signaling peptides. By combining new sample preparation methods and established protocols for bioanalytical mass spectrometry, a high-throughput, small-volume approach is created that allows the study of the peptidome of a variety of nervous systems. Specifically, approximately single-cell-sized samples are rapidly prepared from thin tissue slices by adhering the tissue section to a glass bead array that is anchored to a stretchable membrane. Stretching the membrane fragments the tissue slice into thousands of individual samples, their dimensions predominately governed by the size of the individual glass beads. Application of MALDI matrix, followed by the repeated condensation of liquid microdroplets on the fragmented tissue, allows for maximal analyte extraction and incorporation into MALDI matrix crystals. During extraction, analyte migration between the pieces of tissue on separate beads is prevented by the underlying hydrophobic substrate and by controlling the size of the condensation droplets. The procedure, while general in nature, may be tailored to the needs of a variety of analyses, producing mass spectra equivalent to those acquired from single-cell samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available