4.5 Article

Topical/mucosal delivery of sub-unit vaccines that stimulate the ocular mucosal immune system

Journal

OCULAR SURFACE
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 178-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70164-7

Keywords

conjunctiva-associated lymphoid tissue (CALT); eye-associated lymphoid tissue (EALT); epitope; herpes virus; immune response; lipopeptide; mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT); mucosal immune system; ocular mucosal immune system (OMIS); vaccine

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY015100, EY015225, EY016663, EY14900, EY14017, EY13191, EY12823] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mucosal vaccination is proving to be one of the greatest challenges in modern vaccine development. Although ocular mucosal immunity is highly beneficial for achieving protective immunity, the induction of ocular mucosal immunity against ocular infectious pathogens, particularly herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), which is the leading cause of infec--- tious corneal blindness, remains difficult. Recent developments in cellular and molecular immunology of the ocular mucosal immune system (OMIS) may help in the design of more effective and optimal immunization strategies against ocular pathogens. In this review, we highlight ocular mucosal immunoprophylactic and immunotherapeutic vaccine strategies that have been evaluated to control the many pathogens that attack the surface of the eye. Next, we describe the current understandings of the OMIS and elucidate the structure and the function of the humoral and cellular immune system that protects the surface of the eye. Results from our recent experiments using topical ocular delivery of peptides-CpG and lipopeptide-based vaccines against HSV-1 infection are presented. The future challenges and issues related to the ocular mucosal delivery of molecularly defined sub-unit vaccines are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available