4.4 Article

RANK DISCRIMINANTS FOR PREDICTING PHENOTYPES FROM RNA EXPRESSION

Journal

ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 1469-1491

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/14-AOAS738

Keywords

Cancer classification; gene expression; rank discriminant; order statistics

Funding

  1. NIH-NCRR [UL1 RR 025005]
  2. National Science Foundation [CCF-0845407]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Statistical methods for analyzing large-scale biomolecular data are commonplace in computational biology. A notable example is phenotype prediction from gene expression data, for instance, detecting human cancers, differentiating subtypes and predicting clinical outcomes. Still, clinical applications remain scarce. One reason is that the complexity of the decision rules that emerge from standard statistical learning impedes biological understanding, in particular, any mechanistic interpretation. Here we explore decision rules for binary classification utilizing only the ordering of expression among several genes; the basic building blocks are then two-gene expression comparisons. The simplest example, just one comparison, is the TSP classifier, which has appeared in a variety of cancer-related discovery studies. Decision rules based on multiple comparisons can better accommodate class heterogeneity, and thereby increase accuracy, and might provide a link with biological mechanism. We consider a general framework (rank-in-context) for designing discriminant functions, including a data-driven selection of the number and identity of the genes in the support (context). We then specialize to two examples: voting among several pairs and comparing the median expression in two groups of genes. Comprehensive experiments assess accuracy relative to other, more complex, methods, and reinforce earlier observations that simple classifiers are competitive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available