4.7 Article

Size-resolved particle deposition velocities of sub-100 nm diameter particles over a forest

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 40, Issue 32, Pages 6192-6200

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.066

Keywords

deposition velocity; friction velocity; geometric mean diameter; aerosol particles; forest

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite their importance to accurate prediction of the particle ensemble and associated impacts, few empirical studies have attempted to quantify the dependence of deposition velocities (v(d)) on friction velocity (u(*)) and particle diameter for sub-100 nm particles. Data from a pilot study conducted over a Beech forest in Denmark are used here in to test an indirect method of assessing these dependencies where particle fluxes derived using eddy covariance are conditionally sampled based on parameters of the particle size distribution. The data indicate strongly bi-directional fluxes, with almost 1/3 of all 1/2 h periods exhibiting upwards fluxes particularly during particle formation events. Vertical velocities for particle ensembles with number geometric mean diameter (GMD) of 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60 and 60-70 nm have an approximately equal magnitude during deposition and emission periods which may imply that surface uptake does not strongly limit deposition rates of these particles. The results also indicate a marked size dependence Of v(d). During deposition periods the median v(d) for particle ensembles with a number GMD of 20-30 nm is 4.5 min s(-1) and decreases to 1.5 mm s-1 for particle ensembles with a GMD of 60-70 nm. The median v(d) for periods when the GMD was approximately 55 run is 2.7 min s(-1) and the mean is 4.2 mm s(-1), which agrees well with the mean Vd of 4.3 mm s(-1) for 50 nm particles over a Scots Pine forest at Hyytiala in central Finland. Also, as in the data from Hyytiala, the Vd for GMD of 50-60 nm increases markedly with u(*) from 1 to 1.8 mm s(-1) at u(*) < 0.4 m s(-1), to 7.5 mm s(-1) at u(*) > 1 m s(-1). (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available