Journal
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 1309-1334Publisher
INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS-IMS
DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS291
Keywords
Microarrays; reproducibility; forensic bioinformatics
Categories
Funding
- NIH [P50 CA083639 09, P50 CA070907 08]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
High-throughput biological assays such as microarrays let us ask very detailed questions about how diseases operate, and promise to let us personalize therapy. Data processing, however, is often not described well enough to allow for exact reproduction of the results, leading to exercises in forensic bioinformatics where aspects of raw data and reported results are used to infer what methods must have been employed. Unfortunately, poor documentation can shift from an inconvenience to an active danger when it obscures not just methods but errors. In this report we examine several related papers purporting to use microarray-based signatures of drug sensitivity derived from cell lines to predict patient response. Patients in clinical trials are currently being allocated to treatment arms on the basis of these results. However, we show in five case studies that the results incorporate several simple errors that may be potting patients at risk. One theme that emerges is that the most common errors are simple (e.g., row or column offsets); conversely, it is our experience that the most simple errors are common. We then discuss steps we are taking to avoid such errors in our own investigations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available