4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Increased neonatal fat mass, not lean body mass, is associated with maternal obesity

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 195, Issue 4, Pages 1100-1103

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.014

Keywords

pregnancy; obesity; body mass index; body fat

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00080] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-11089] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare body composition measures in neonates of women who were overweight/obese (body mass index, >= 25 kg/m(2)) versus women who were lean/average (body mass index, < 25 kg/m(2)), all of whom had normal glucose tolerance levels. Study design: Seventy-six neonates (34 female and 42 male) of singleton pregnancies of pregravid overweight/obese women and 144 neonates (67 female and 77 male) of lean/average women were assessed with anthropometric measures and total body electrical conductivity evaluation of body composition at birth. Results: There was a borderline increase in birthweight (3436 +/- 567 g vs 3284 +/- 534 g; P = .051) but not lean body mass (3020 +/- 410 g vs 2950 +/- 400 g; P = .23) in the overweight/obese versus lean/average weight groups. However, there were significant increases in percent body fat (11.6% +/- 4.7% vs 9.7 +/- 4.3%; P = .003) and fat mass (420 +/- 220 g vs 380 +/- 170 g; P = .01) in neonates of overweight/obese women versus lean/average weight women. Conclusion: Overweight/obese women with normal glucose tolerance levels have neonates who are heavier than lean/average weight women because of increased adiposity. We speculate that this increased obesity in offspring of obese women with normal glucose tolerance levels is a significant risk for adolescent obesity and components of the metabolic syndrome. (c) 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available