4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

In vitro fungistatic and fungicidal activities of silver sulfadiazine and natamycin on pathogenic fungi isolated from horses with keratomycosis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 10, Pages 1788-1793

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.67.10.1788

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To evaluate the in vitro antifungal properties of silver sulfadiazine (SSD) and natamycin against filamentous fungi isolated from eyes of horses with keratomycosis. Sample Population-Filamentous fungal isolates obtained from eyes of keratomycosis-affected horses. Procedures-Fungal culture of ocular samples yielded 6 Fusarium spp; 7 Aspergillus spp,- and 1 isolate each of Curvularia, Scopulariopsis, Penicillium, and Chrysosporium. For each fungal isolate, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of SSD and natamycin were determined. Results-For all 17 fungal isolates, SSD MIC distribution ranged from <= 1 to > 64 mu g/ml; MIC50 and MIC90 (MICs at which 50% and 90% of organisms were inhibited) were 4 and 32 mu g/mL, respectively. The SSD MFC distribution for all isolates was : 1 to > 64 mu g/mL; MFC50 and MFC90 (MFCs at which 50% and 90% of organisms were killed) were 8 and > 64 mu g/mL, respectively. For all fungal isolates, natamycin MIC distribution ranged from 256 to > 1,000 mu g/mL; MIC50 and MIC90 were 512 and > 1,000 mu g/mL, respectively. The natamycin MFC distribution for all isolates ranged from 512 to > 1,000 mu g/mL; MFC50 and MFC90 were each > 1,000 mu g/mL. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-These in vitro data suggest that SSD is fungicidal against the fungal isolates that were obtained from eyes of horses with keratomycosis and that natamycin is fungicidal against some of the isolates at the drug concentrations evaluated. Silver sulfadiazine may be a therapeutic option for equine keratomycosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available