4.1 Article

Enterococcus faecium EK13 -: an enterocin A-producing strain with probiotic character and its effect in piglets

Journal

ANAEROBE
Volume 12, Issue 5-6, Pages 242-248

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.09.003

Keywords

enterocin A; probiotic; Enterococcus faecium; piglet; microflora; biochemical parameters

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experiment was conducted to determine the effects of the inoculation of the probiotic and enterocin A-producing strain Enterococeus faecium EK13 on selected parameters of metabolic profile, gut microflora, growth, and health in newborn piglets of Slovak White Improved. Piglets for study were divided into two groups: one group (EK13 group, n 8) received strain EK13 per os once daily for 7 days (2 ml per piglet, 10(9) CFU/mL of saline buffer). The control group of piglets (n = 7) was given placebo-saline buffer. The experiment lasted 14 days. After 7 days, strain EK13 reached 9.8 log(10) CFU/g in faeces of E. faecium EK13 treated piglets while counts of Escherichia coli were significantly lower (P < 0.01) than in piglets of the control group. The concentrations of total serum protein, calcium, haemoglobin, haematocrit, red blood cell count and index of phagocytic activity of leukocytes were significantly higher after application of strain EK13. On the other hand, cholesterol was significantly lower in the EK13 group of animals. On day 14, piglets were killed and samples of intestinal contents were taken. Total counts of bacteria in the intestinal contents (jejunum, ileum, caecum, colon) were not significantly influenced. The pH value was significantly lower (P < 0.05) only in duodenum of piglets receiving E. faecium EK13. There was a significant higher concentration of lactic acid (P < 0.01) and propionic acid in the colon (P < 0.001) of the EK13 group. Application of E. faecium EK13 did not influence the daily body weight gain significantly. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available