4.5 Article

Molecular insights from a novel cardiac troponin I mouse model of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 623-632

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.07.016

Keywords

troponin I gene; hypertrophy; cardiomyopathy; mice; calcium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene mutations in cardiac troponin I (cTnI) account for up to 5% of genotyped families with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC). Little is known about how cTnI mutations cause disease. Five lines of transgenic mice were generated which overexpress the human disease-causing cTnI gene mutation, Gly203Ser (designated cTnI-G203S), in a cardiac-specific manner. Mice were compared to transgenic mice that overexpress normal cTnI (cTnI-wt) and non-transgenic littermates (NTG). cTnI-G203S mice developed all the characteristic features of FHC by age 21 weeks. Left ventricular hypertrophy was observed on echocardiography (1.25 +/- 0.05 turn vs. 0.86 +/- 0.02 mm in cTnI-wt, P < 0.01), associated with a significant 4-fold increase in RNA markers of hypertrophy, ANF and BNP. Myocyte hypertrophy, myofiber disarray and interstitial fibrosis were observed in cTnI-G203S mice. Expression of the cTnI-G203S mutation in neonatal cardiomyocytes resulted in a significant increase in myocyte volume, and reduced interactions with both troponins T and C. Ca2+ cycling was abnormal in adult cardiomyocytes extracted from cTnI-G203S mice, with a prolonged decay constant in Ca2+ transients and a reduced decay constant in response to caffeine treatment. Mice with the cTnI-G203S gene mutation develop all the phenotypic features of human FHC. The cTnI-G203S mutation disrupts interactions with partner proteins, and results in intracellular Ca2+ dysregulation early in life, suggesting a pathogenic role in development of FHC. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available