4.4 Article

Impairments as measured by ISS do not greatly change between one and eight years after CRPS 1 diagnosis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 639-644

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.10.003

Keywords

CRPS 1; impairment level sumscore ISS; outcome; warm; cold

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 (CRPS 1) is a potentially incapacitating complication in which pain seems to be the most disabling factor. We performed a late follow up study of a well-defined CRPS I population more than eight years after diagnosis. The relationships between early and late impairments were studied with a view to outcome prediction and to investigate possible differences in long-term impairments according to initial CRPS I subdiagnosis (i.e. warm or cold, diagnosed according to skin temperature measured via infrared thermometer). Methods: We again measured patients using the Impairment Level SumScore (ISS) (T8). These data were compared with earlier ISS measurements at CRPS diagnosis (T0) and after one year's treatment (T1). Correlations were determined between these measures. Results: Forty-five patients participated in the present study. Total median ISS improved by 55% (statistically/clinically significant) after one year's treatment (T1), and worsened (non-significantly) by 14% from T1 to T8 - without differences according to original subdiagnosis. ISS correlations were stronger for T1 vs. T8 than for TO vs. T1 or T0 vs. T8, being strongest for the ISS factors related to pain. Conclusions: Considerable impairments, as measured by ISS, are still present over eight years after first CRPS I diagnosis. These do not greatly change between one and eight years post-diagnosis. ISS outcomes are similar for cold and warm CRPS I diagnostic subgroups. Component ISS scores associated with pain appear to possess greatest predictive power. (C) 2005 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available