4.2 Article

Noninvasive diagnosis of cellular and antibody-mediated rejection by perforin and granzyme B in renal allografts

Journal

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 10, Pages 777-786

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.07.006

Keywords

cellular rejection; antibody-mediated rejection; perforin; granzyme B; novel statistical analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A major milestone in transplantation would be the use of biomarkers to monitor rejection. We examined the association between perforin and granzyme-B gene expression detected in the peripheral blood of renal allograft recipients with cellular and antibodymediated rejection. Furthermore, we judged the appropriateness of assigning negative rejection statuses to persons without a biopsy whose grafts were functioning well clinically. Of the 46 patients who completed the study, recipients with cellular rejection had higher perforin and granzyme-B levels compared with nonrejectors (p = 0.006). Interestingly, recipients with antibody-mediated rejection also had higher perforin and granzyme-B levels compared with nonrejectors (p = 0.04). Patients with high levels of granzyme B had a probability of rejecting that was 26.7 times greater than those patients with levels of granzyme B. Perforin and granzyme B had sensitivities of 50176 and specificities of 9596 in predicting rejection (cutoff value = 140). Assigning negative rejection statuses to recipients without a biopsy whose grafts were functioning well did not have a major effect on the direction or significance of covariate values. This study suggests that perforin and granzyme-B gene expressions in peripheral blood are accurate in detecting both cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. Human Immunology 67; 777-786 (2006). (c) American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, 2006. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available