4.4 Article

Use of X-chromosome inactivation pattern to determine the clonal origins of uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma

Journal

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 1350-1356

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.05.005

Keywords

clonality; x-chromosome inactivation; leiomyosarcoma; leiomyoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uterine leiomyomas (LMs) and leiomyosarcomas (LMSs), both of smooth muscle origin, sometimes coexist in the same uterus. Little genetic evidence exists concerning the developmental relationship between LM and LMS. Using the X-chromosome inactivation pattern of the human androgen receptor gene, we examined the clonality of LM and LMS. Of the 24 patients with LM, 21 had multiple neoplasms; all were clonal and individual LMs derived from separate clones. Of the 20 patients with LMS, 6 exhibited multiple tumors in the uterus, and 4 of these individuals also harbored coexisting uterine LMs. We found all LMSs to be clonal. Separate tumors showed identical pattern of X inactivation in 4 patients, and in 2 other individuals, multiple LMSs developed from independent clones. Among the 4 patients with LMS and coexisting LM, 3 showed the same pattern of X inactivation in LMS and the adjacent LM. In 2 of the 3 patients, the tumor also exhibited a morphological transition between benign cells in LM and malignant cells in LMS, supporting the possibility of transformation from LM to LMS. One patient displayed different clones in LMS and the coexisting LM, indicating their independent origins. We conclude that (i) both LM and LMS are clonal; (ii) different nodules in multiple LM are of independent origins; (iii) multiple lesions of LMS may be either monoclonal or multiclonal; (iv) most LMSs are solitary lesions and are most likely de novo, but an individual LM may undergo malignant transformation to a LMS; and (v) some LMSs and coexisting LMs are of independent origins. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available