4.5 Article

Stabilization and determination of a PPAR agonist in human urine using automated 96-well liquid-liquid extraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.05.004

Keywords

bovine serum albumin; LC-MS/MS; urine; stabilization of acylglucuronide metabolite; automated liquid-liquid extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two stability challenges were encountered during development of an urine assay for a proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist, I (2-{[5,7-dipropyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2-benzisoxazol-6-yl]oxy}-2-methyl propionic acid), indicated for the treatment of Type II diabetes. First, the analyte was lost in urine samples due to adsorption on container surface which is a common problem during clinical sample handling. Secondly, the acylglucuronide metabolite (III), a major metabolite of I, displayed limited stability and effected the quantitation of parent drug due to the release of I through hydrolysis. Therefore, a clinical collection procedure was carefully established to stabilize I and its acylglucuronide metabolite, III, in human urine. The metabolite was not quantitated with this method. The urine samples are treated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) equal to 1.75% of the urine volume and formic acid equal to 1% of urine volume. Compound (I) and internal standard (II) were extracted from urine with 1 mL ethyl acetate using a fully automated liquid-liquid extraction in 96-well plate format. The analytes are separated by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry in multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode used for detection. The urine method has a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 0.05 ng/mL with a linearity range of 0.05-20 ng/mL using 0.05 mL of urine. The method was validated and used to assay urine clinical samples. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available