4.6 Article

Comparative genomics and experimental characterization of N-acetylglucosamine utilization pathway of Shewanella oneidensis

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 40, Pages 29872-29885

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605052200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [1R01-AI059146-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used a comparative genomics approach implemented in the SEED annotation environment to reconstruct the chitin and GlcNAc utilization subsystem and regulatory network in most proteobacteria, including 11 species of Shewanella with completely sequenced genomes. Comparative analysis of candidate regulatory sites allowed us to characterize three different GlcNAc- specific regulons, NagC, NagR, and NagQ, in various proteobacteria and to tentatively assign a number of novel genes with specific functional roles, in particular new GlcNAc- related transport systems, to this subsystem. Genes SO3506 and SO3507, originally annotated as hypothetical in Shewanella onei-densis MR-1, were suggested to encode novel variants of GlcN-6-P deaminase and GlcNAc kinase, respectively. Reconstitution of the GlcNAc catabolic pathway in vitro using these purified recombinant proteins and GlcNAc-6-P deacetylase (SO3505) validated the entire pathway. Kinetic characterization of GlcN-6-P deaminase demonstrated that it is the subject of allosteric activation by GlcNAc- 6- P. Consistent with genomic data, all tested Shewanella strains except S. frigidimarina, which lacked representative genes for the GlcNAc metabolism, were capable of utilizing GlcNAc as the sole source of carbonandenergy. Thisstudyexpandstherangeofcarbonsubstrates utilized by Shewanella spp., unambiguously identifies several genes involved in chitin metabolism, and describes a novel variant of the classical three- step biochemical conversion of GlcNAc to fructose 6- phosphate first described in Escherichia coli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available