4.6 Article

Multiple antigenic mimotopes of HIV carbohydrate antigens - Relating structure and antigenicity

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 40, Pages 29675-29683

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M604137200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-49092] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbohydrate mimetic peptides are designable, and they can carry T-cell epitopes and circumvent tolerance. A mimic- based human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine can be a viable alternative to carbohydrate- based antigens if the diversity of epitopes found on gp120 can be recapitulated. To improve existing mimics, an attempt was made to study the structural correlates of the observed polyspecificity of carbohydrate mimetic peptides based on the Y( P/ R) Y motif in more detail. A carbohydrate mimetic peptide, D002 ( RGGLCYCRYRYCVCVGR), bound a number of lectins with different specificities. Although this peptide reacted strongly with both lotus and concanavalinA ( ConA) lectins, it bound to lotus stronger than ConA. By varying the central motif RYRY, five versions were produced in multiple antigen peptide format, and their avidity for lotus and ConA lectins was tested by surface plasmon resonance. Although the kinetic parameters were similar, the version based on the sequence YPYRY had an optimal affinity for both lectins as well as improved avidity for wheat germ agglutinin and phytohemagglutinin. Thus, as far as lectin specificity is concerned, YPYRY had improved multiple antigenic properties. Both RYRY and YPYRY precipitated antibodies from human IgG for intravenous use that bound to gp120 in vitro and immunoprecipitated gp120 from transfected CHO- PI cells. Thus, Y( P/ R) Y motifs mimic multiple carbohydrate epitopes, many of which are found on HIV, and preimmune human IgG antibodies that bind to HIV carbohydrates cross- react to a comparable extent with both RYRY and YPYRY carbohydrate mimetic peptides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available