4.7 Article

Diffuse, nonthermal X-ray emission from the Galactic star cluster Westerlund 1

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 650, Issue 1, Pages 203-211

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/507175

Keywords

stars : winds, outflows; supernova remnants; X-rays : ISM; X-rays : stars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the diffuse X-ray emission identified in Chandra observations of the young, massive Galactic star cluster Westerlund 1. After removing pointlike X-ray sources down to a completeness limit of approximate to 2 x 10(31) ergs s(-1), we identify ( 3 +/- 1); 1034 ergs s(-1) ( 2-8 keV) of diffuse emission. The spatial distribution of the emission can be described as a slightly elliptical Lorentzian core with a half-width at half-maximum along the major axis of 2500 +/- 100, similar to the distribution of point sources in the cluster, plus a 50 halo of extended emission. The spectrum of the diffuse emission is dominated by a hard continuum component that can be described as a kT greater than or similar to 3 keV thermal plasma that has a low iron abundance ( less than or similar to 0.3 solar) or as nonthermal emission that could be stellar light that is inverse Compton scattered by MeVelectrons. Only 5% of the flux is produced by a kT approximate to 0.7 keV plasma. The low luminosity of the thermal emission and the lack of a 6.7 keV iron line suggest that less than or similar to 40,000 unresolved stars with masses between 0.3 and 2 M-circle dot are present in the cluster, fewer than previously estimated. Moreover, the flux in the diffuse emission is a factor of several lower than would be expected from a supersonically expanding cluster wind, and there is no evidence for thermal remnants produced by supernovae. Less than 10(-5) of the mechanical luminosity of the cluster is dissipated as 2-8 keV X-rays, leaving a large amount of energy that either is radiated at other wavelengths, is dissipated beyond the bounds of our image, or escapes into the intergalactic medium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available