4.8 Article

Mitosis-specific mechanosensing and contractile-protein redistribution control cell shape

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages 1962-1967

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM066817, R01 GM066817-03, R01 GM071920, GM071920, R01 GM066817-04, R01 GM066817-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because cell-division failure is deleterious, promoting tumorigenesis in mammals [1], cells utilize numerous mechanisms to control their cell-cycle progression [2-4]. Though cell division is considered a well-ordered sequence of biochemical events [5], cytokinesis, an inherently mechanical process, must also be mechanically controlled to ensure that two equivalent daughter cells are produced with high fidelity. Given that cells respond to their mechanical environment [6,7], we hypothesized that cells utilize mechanosensing and mechanical feedback to sense and correct shape asymmetries during cytokinesis. Because the mitotic spindle and myosin II are vital to cell division [8, 9], we explored their roles in responding to shape perturbations during cell division. We demonstrate that the contractile proteins myosin II and cortexillin I redistribute in response to intrinsic and externally induced shape asymmetries. In early cytokinesis, mechanical load overrides spindle cues and slows cytokinesis progression while contractile proteins accumulate and correct shape asymmetries. In late cytokinesis, mechanical perturbation also directs contractile proteins but without apparently disrupting cytokinesis. Significantly, this response only occurs during anaphase through cytokinesis, does not require microtubules, and is independent of spindle orientation, but is dependent on myosin II. Our data provide evidence for a mechanosensory system that directs contractile proteins to regulate cell shape during mitosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available