4.7 Article

The association between C-reactive protein levels and depression:: Results from the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort study

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 60, Issue 8, Pages 825-830

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.016

Keywords

CRP; depression; cohort study; inflammation; gender

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To investigate whether depressive episodes (previous, current single, and recurrent) are associated in both genders with highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, earlier recommended for risk assessment of cardiovascular disease. The impact of the severity of current single and recurrent depressive episodes on this putative association was also investigated. Methods: The genetically homogeneous Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort was followed until age 31, when, in a cross-sectional setting (n = 5269), the highly sensitive enzyme immunoassay (bs-F-IA) method was used to measure CRP concentration. Depressive episodes were defined through mailed questionnaires, including Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) and information oil. self-reported, doctor-diagnosed depression. Results: After adjusting for confounders, logistic regression analyses showed that in male subjects, elevated hs-CRP levels (>= 1.0 mg/L) fold, respectively. Correspondingly, an increased the probability for severe current and recurrent depressive episodes 1.7-fold and 3.1-fold level of > 3.0 mg/L increased the probability for recurrent depression up to 4.1-fold. In female subjects, no statistically significant associations were found. Conclusions: Our results support the hypothesis that an activation of systemic inflammatory Processes may contribute to the pathophysiology of severe depression in men. Further investigations are needed regarding the impact of our findings on diagnostic/treatment strategies concerning severe and, especially recurrent, depression in men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available