4.5 Article

5′ and 3′ region variability in the dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3), pesticide exposure and Parkinson's disease risk:: a hypothesis-generating study

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 15, Issue 20, Pages 3055-3062

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddl247

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES 07032, R01 ES 10750, P30 ES 07033, P42 ES 04696] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dopamine transporter gene (SLC6A3) is a candidate gene for Parkinson's disease (PD) on the basis of its critical role in dopaminergic neurotransmission. Previously, we identified 22 SNPs in the 5' region of SLC6A3, which segregate as eight haplotypes that differ in transcriptional activity when transfected in rat dopamine-producing cells. In the present work from a case-control study size of 293 cases and 395 controls, we employed a cladistic approach to examine gene-disease association. First, we found strong evidence of balancing selection in this region, as determined by a Tajima's D statistic of 2.97 (P < 0.001). Second, we found that the eight haplotypes fit into two main clades and that diplotypes of these clades were marginally associated with PD. Then, after we classified cases and controls by the number of risk alleles, accounting for the well-known 3' region VNTR polymorphism, we found that having two or more risk alleles resulted in a modest but significant increase in PD risk [odds ratio=1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.40]. Finally, we detected a significant interaction between occupational pesticide exposure in men and the number of risk alleles. Among pesticide-exposed subjects, the odds ratio for having two or more risk alleles was 5.66 (95% CI: 1.73-18.53). Thus, allelic variants in SLC6A3, which affect gene expression, are associated with PD in this population and may interact with occupational pesticide exposure to increase PD risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available