4.7 Article

FLT3 internal tandem duplication in CD34+/CD33- precursors predicts poor outcome in acute myeloid leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages 2764-2769

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-012260

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U24 CA 114766, R21 CA 102624, U10 CA 98543, 5T32 CA 009351-27, R01 CA114563, R01 CA 092316, R01 CA 114563] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

`Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal disease characterized by heterogeneous involvement of hematopoietic stem cell/progenitor cell populations. Using FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD) as a molecular marker, we tested the hypothesis that clinical outcome in AML correlates with disease involvement of CD34(+)/ CD33(-) precursors. Diagnostic specimens from 24 children with FLT3/ITD-positive AML were sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and resultant CD34(+)/CD33(-) and CD34(+)/CD33(+) progenitors were analyzed directly and after colony-forming cell (CFC) assay for the presence of FLT3/ITD. FLT3/ITD was present in all CD34(+)/CD33(+) patient samples. In contrast, FLT3/ITD was detected in CD34+/CD33- progenitors in only 19 of 24 samples. A bipotent progenitor was affected in a subset of patients, as evidenced by the presence of FLT3/ITD in both granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming unit (BFU-E) colonies. Those patients in whom CD34(+)/CD33(-) precursors harbored the FLT3/ITD had worse clinical outcome; actuarial event-free survival (EFS) at 4 years from study entry for those patients with and without FLT3/ITD detection in CD34(+)/CD33(-) progenitors was 11% +/- 14% versus 100% +/- 0%, respectively (P = .002). This study suggests that FLT3/ITD involvement in CD34(+)/CD33(-) precursors is heterogeneous and that detection of the mutation in the less-mature progenitor population may be associated with disease resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available