4.7 Article

Prognostic significance of cyclin A in gastric cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 119, Issue 8, Pages 1897-1901

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21944

Keywords

cyclin A; HuR; gastric cancer; prognosis; survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High level of cyclin A promotes carcinogenesis, and overexpression of cyclin A has been associated with poor prognosis of cancer patients. We validated the prognostic role of cyclin A in gastric cancer and evaluated its correlation with expression of an mRNA stability factor HuR. From 342 consecutive histologically confirmed gastric cancer patients were obtained 325 representative tissue specimens for cyclin A and 316 for HuR immunohistochemistry. Specimens were stained by cyclin A and HuR specific monoclonal antibodies. Nuclear immunostaining detected in >= 5% of the tumor cells was considered the cut-off for cyclin A positivity. Positive HuR immunoreactivity was scored as nuclear or cytoplasmic. Associations between scores, clinicopathological factors and survival were calculated by the chi(2)-test, Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier test and Cox model. Cyclin A detected in the nuclei of cancer cells was positive in 55% (179 of 325) of the specimens; 40% (127 of 316) of the specimens had cytoplasmic and 88% (279 of 316) nuclear immunoreactivity of HuR. Cyclin A expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival. Cyclin A immunoreactivity was associated with old age, high stage, proximal location of the tumor, intestinal type, noncurative resection, advanced penetration depth and with nodal metastases but not distant metastases. Furthermore, cyclin A expression was associated with cytoplasmic HuR expression, whereas no association with nuclear HuR was evident. Cyclin A is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer, and one mechanism for its overexpression may depend on cytoplasmic localization of HuR. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available