4.6 Article

The arginase II gene is an anti-inflammatory target of liver X receptor in macrophages

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 43, Pages 32197-32206

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605237200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 30568, HL 66088] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The liver X receptors (LXRs) are ligand-dependent transcription factors that have been implicated in lipid metabolism and inflammation. LXRs also inhibit the expression of inflammatory genes in macrophages, including inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Some of these actions are mediated through LXR antagonism of NF-kappa B activity. The potential for LXRs to positively regulate the expression of anti-inflammatory molecules, however, has not been explored. Here we show that the arginase II (ArgII) gene is a direct target for LXR regulation. ArgII catalyzes the conversion of L-arginine into L-ornithine and urea, leading to the synthesis of polyamines. Expression of ArgII is induced by LXR agonists in macrophage cell lines and primary murine macrophages in a receptor-dependent manner. The ArgII promoter contains a functional LXR response elements that mediates promoter induction by LXR/RXR (retinoid X receptor) in transfection assays. Since ArgII and iNOS utilize a common substrate, induction of ArgII expression has the potential to exert anti-inflammatory effects by shifting arginine metabolism toward polyamine synthesis at the expense of NO production. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrate that forced expression of ArgII mimics the inhibitory effect of LXR activation on macrophage NO production. Furthermore, inhibition of arginase activity partially reverses the inhibitory effect of LXR agonists on NO production. These studies suggest that regulation of ArgII may contribute to the immunomodulatory effects of LXRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available