4.7 Article

A phase-field/gradient damage model for brittle fracture in elastic-plastic solids

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 269-296

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.09.005

Keywords

Fracture; Elastic-plastic material; Finite elements; Phase-field

Funding

  1. CAPES [PCPP 004/2011]
  2. CNPq [312153/2013-9]
  3. European Research Council under the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme (FP)/ERC Grant [320815]
  4. Joint Research Project Mercosur (CAPES, Brazil)
  5. Joint Research Project Mercosur (SPU, Argentina)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formulation of a phase-field continuum theory for brittle fracture in elastic plastic solids and its computational implementation are presented in this contribution. The theory is based on a virtual-power formulation in which two additional and independent kinematical descriptors are introduced, namely the phase-field and the accumulated plastic strain. Further, it incorporates irreversibility of both phase-field and plastic strain evolutions by introducing suitable constraints and by carefully heeding the influence of those constraints on the kinetics underlying microstructural changes associated with plasticity and fracture. The numerical implementation employs the finite-element method for spatial discretization and a splitting scheme with sub-stepping for the time integration. To illustrate its potential utility, we apply the model to a number of well known linear, as well as non-linear, fracture mechanics problems. The described phase-field model, coupled with plasticity, provides a feasible technique to analyzing crack initiation and the subsequent crack growth resistance only if the length scale parameter included in the phase-field model is finite and treated as a material parameter which should be properly characterized. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available