4.7 Article

Spectropolarimetry of the 3.4 μm feature in the diffuse ISM toward the Galactic center quintuplet cluster

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 651, Issue 1, Pages 268-271

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/507462

Keywords

dust, extinction; ISM : clouds; ISM : general; ISM : individual (GCS 3-II, GCS 3-IV); ISM : lines and bands; ISM : molecules

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/C50352X/1, PP/D000920/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aliphatic hydrocarbons exhibit an absorption feature at 3.4 mu m, observed toward sources that sample diffuse regions of the interstellar medium ( ISM). The absorbers responsible for this feature are assumed to reside in some component of interstellar dust, but the physical nature of the particles ( size, shape, structure, etc.) is uncertain. Observations of interstellar polarization provide discrimination. Since the grains that carry the silicate absorption feature are known to be aligned, polarization across the 3.4 mu m hydrocarbon feature can be used to test the silicate-core organic refractory mantle grain theory. Although the 3.4 mu m feature has been observed to be devoid of polarization for one line of sight toward the Galactic center, a corresponding silicate polarization measurement for the same line of sight was not available. Here, we present spectropolarimetric observations of GCS 3-II and GCS 3-IV toward the Galactic center, where the 9.7 mu m silicate polarization has been previously observed. We show that polarization is not detected across the 3.4 mu m feature to a limit of 0.06% +/- 0.13% (GCS 3-II) and 0.15% +/- 0.31% (GCS 3-IV), well below the lowest available prediction of polarization on the basis of the core-mantlemodel. We conclude that the hydrocarbons in the diffuse ISM do not reside on the same grains as the silicates, and likely form a separate population of small grains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available