4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 262-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.018

Keywords

treatment decision-making; shared decision-making; physician-patient encounter; physician-patient communication; culture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In this paper we discuss the influence of culture on the process of treatment decision-making, and in particular, shared treatment decision-making in the physician-patient encounter. We explore two key issues: (1) the meaning of culture and the ways that it can affect treatment decision-making; (2) cultural issues and assumptions underlying the development and use of treatment decision aids. Methods: This is a conceptual paper. Based on our knowledge and reading of the key literature in the treatment decision-making field, we looked for written examples where cultural influences were taken into account when discussing the physician-patient encounter and when designing instruments (decision aids) to help patients participate in making decisions. Results: Our assessment of the situation is that to date, and with some recent exceptions, research in the above areas has not been culturally sensitive. Conclusion: We suggest that more research attention should be focused on exploring potential cultural variations in the meaning of and preferences for shared decision-making as well as on the applicability across cultural groups of decision aids developed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decision-making with physicians. Practice implications: Both patients and physicians need to be aware of the cultural assumptions underlying the development and use of decision aids and assess their cultural sensitivity to the needs and preferences of patients in diverse cultural groups. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available