4.3 Article

Course of depressive symptoms in patients undergoing heart surgery: Confirmatory analysis of the factor pattern and latent mean structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

Journal

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 922-930

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000244391.56598.10

Keywords

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; depressive symptoms; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; valve surgery; confirmatory factor analysis; latent mean structure analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the dimensionality, stability, and course of depressive symptoms over the 12-month period beginning approximately I week before heart surgery. Methods: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was administered to 570 patients before heart surgery and 1, 3.5, 6.5, and 12.5 months later. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis rejected a four-factor model as a result of small variances for two interpersonal items. With their elimination, a three-factor solution (negative affect, low positive affect, somatic/vegetative symptoms) showed good psychometric properties. Except for the somatic/vegetative factor at the I-month follow up, there was a high degree of stability in the factor pattern over a 12-month period beginning approximately I week before heart surgery. Latent mean structure analysis indicated that, apart from elevations in several somatic/vegetative symptoms during the month after surgery, means for all three depressive symptoms declined over time. The recovery of positive affect showed a steeper trajectory toward the end of the follow-up period by comparison with the rates of decline for depressed affect and somatic/vegetative symptoms. Conclusions: These findings support using 18 CES-D items to measure three depressive symptom dimensions in heart patients and may reflect a non-native pattern of adjustment to heart surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available