4.6 Article

Heterotaxy syndrome with functional single ventricle: Does prenatal diagnosis improve survival?

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 1629-1636

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.039

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Despite improved outcome for many single ventricle lesions, staged reconstruction for heterotaxy syndrome with a functional single ventricle continues to have a high mortality. Prenatal identification of heterotaxy syndrome may improve long-term survival. Methods. Our database was reviewed from January 1996 to December 2004 for patients with heterotaxy syndrome. Assessment was made for prenatal diagnosis and echocardiographic characteristics of heterotaxy syndrome. We sought to assess the accuracy of fetal echocardiography in the diagnosis of heterotaxy syndrome and determine whether prenatal diagnosis and other risk factors have an impact on survival in patients with heterotaxy syndrome. Results. Of 81 patients that met criteria, 43 ( 53%) had prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal diagnosis had high specificity and positive predictive value for all findings but had low sensitivity for anomalous pulmonary veins. Among the 70 patients born alive, survival was 60% with median follow-up of 51.4 months ( range, 6.5 to 109.7 months). Prenatal diagnosis did not improve survival ( p = 0.09). None of the 11 patients with complete heart block ( CHB) survived past 3 months of age. Two patients underwent heart transplantation as their first intervention and have survived. CHB and anomalous pulmonary venous connection were associated with shorter duration of survival. Conclusions. Prenatal diagnosis of heterotaxy syndrome does not improve survival in patients who undergo single ventricle reconstruction. The most potent risk factors for poor outcome ( CHB, anomalous pulmonary veins) are likely not impacted by identification in utero. In light of the poor outcome, cardiac transplantation as an initial therapy may be a viable option for some patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available