4.7 Article

Annexin A5 polymorphism (-1C→T) and the presence of anti-annexin A5 antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 65, Issue 11, Pages 1468-1472

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.045237

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Annexin A5 is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-a syndrome characterised by recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Objective: To investigate whether anti-annexin A5 immunoglobulin (Ig) M or IgG antibodies, or the -1C -> T polymorphism of annexin A5, is a risk factor for thrombosis or miscarriage, and whether the -1C -> T polymorphism is correlated with APS. Methods: A cohort study was carried out with a population of 198 patients with primary APS, systemic lupus erythematosus or lupus-like disease. For the detection of anti-annexin A5 antibodies and the measurement of annexin A5 plasma levels, ELISA-type methods were used. The annexin A5 -1C -> T mutation was detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results: 71 patients were positive for annexin A5 IgM or IgG antibodies, of whom 53 patients were positive for anti-annexin A5 IgG antibodies and 27 of 198 patients were positive for anti-annexin A5 IgM antibodies. The prevalence of IgM or IgG anti-annexin A5 antibodies was not significantly associated with thrombosis or miscarriage on multivariate analysis. The prevalence of the -1C -> T mutation in the annexin A5 gene (46/198 patients) was significantly associated with miscarriage (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 6.7, independent risk factor). Conclusion: The detection of anti-annexin A5 antibodies does not seem relevant for estimating the risk for thrombosis or miscarriage in APS. The -1C -> T mutation was an independent risk factor for miscarriage, which is independent of APS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available