4.6 Article

Raloxifene enhances vertebral mechanical properties independent of bone density

Journal

BONE
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 1130-1135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.05.007

Keywords

bisphosphonates; SERMS; osteoporosis; microdamage; biomechanics

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [C06 RR 10601-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [5T32 AR 007581-09, 5R01 AR 047838-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anti-remodeling agents produce similar reductions in vertebral fracture risk despite large differences in BMD changes suggesting the mechanism of fracture risk reduction may differ among these agents. Forty-eight intact (non-ovariectomized) skeletally mature female beagle dogs were treated orally for 12 months with clinically relevant doses of risedronate (RIS, 0.10 mg/kg/day), alendronate (ALN, 0.2 mg/kg/day), raloxifene (RAL, 0.50 mg/kg/day), or saline (VEH, 1 ml/kg/day). After sacrifice, the following measurements were made on vertebral bone: areal (aBMD) and volumetric (vBMD) bone mineral densities, tissue mineralization by ash content, static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters, microdamage, and extrinsic and intrinsic measures of biomechanical strength, stiffness and energy to fracture. At these doses, RAL suppressed bone turnover (-20%) significantly less than the bisphosphonates (-66 and -71%) and did not produce significant differences in aBMD, vBMD, BV/TV or percent ash compared to VEH-treated animals. Microdamage accumulation in RAL-treated animals was not significantly different than VEH; both RIS and ALN had significantly higher crack surface density compared to VEH. Stiffness was significantly higher than VEH in all treatment groups. Ultimate load divided by aBMD, a measure of strength independent of BMD, was significantly higher only in RAL-treated animals compared to VEH (+16%, P = 0.015). Based on these data, we conclude that raloxifene produces improvements in bone mechanical properties in ways that do not involve increases in BMD. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available