4.6 Article

Distributions of mortality risk attributable to low nutritional status in Niakhar, Senegal

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 136, Issue 11, Pages 2893-2900

Publisher

AMER SOCIETY NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1093/jn/136.11.2893

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a method for computing the distributions of mortality risk attributable to malnutrition among children of developing countries. Population distributions of nutritional status were adjusted with a normal curve and the relation between mortality and nutritional status was fitted with a linear logistic model after controlling for age. The attributable risk for mortality could therefore be computed at any threshold of low nutritional status. The method was applied in Niakhar, Senegal, where a comprehensive study of the relation between nutritional status and mortality was conducted in 19831984 on similar to 5000 children, 6-59 mo of age. The anthropometric indicators used were Z-scores of weight-for-age, weight-for -height, height-for-age, head circumference-for-age, arm circumference-for-age, triceps skinfold-for-age, and subscapular skinfold-for-age, plus arm circumference, body mass index, and 2 composite indicators. Population attributable fraction varied according to indicators selected and ranged from 31% (head circumference) to 65% (arm circumference). The 2 composite indicators summarizing the whole nutritional status provided the same value for the population attributable fraction (59 and 60%, respectively). Classic thresholds of mild, moderate, and severe malnutrition are presented, as well as the bivariate distribution of wasting and stunting. Whatever the indicator used, mortality attributable risks appeared evenly distributed along the scale of low nutritional status. Our findings question the value of using classic thresholds of mild, moderate, and severe malnutrition (developed by clinicians for practical purposes) for nutritional epidemiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available