4.2 Review

Clinical assessment of endothelial dysfunction: combine and rule

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 617-624

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000247497.62505.72

Keywords

cardiovascular complications; chronic kidney disease; endothelial cell dysfunction; inflammation; nitric oxide; oxidative stress

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK054602, DK45462] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review To briefly survey the literature for the past 2-3 years on the subject of diagnostic and prognostic markers of endothelial cell dysfunction. Recent findings Established and emerging techniques to detect endothelial cell dysfunction are divided into two large families: (1) functional and structural markers of endothelial cell dysfunction, and (2) surrogate markers of endothelial cell dysfunction. The first category includes high-resolution Doppler studies of conduit arteries, laser Doppler flowmetry of cutaneous microvasculature, and measurements of arterial stiffness and intima: media thickness. The second category of tests provides brief descriptions of detection of oxidative stress, inflammation, coagulation abnormalities, circulating endothelial cells and microparticles. I also focus on integration of various techniques and some novel genomic, proteomic and metabolomic tests. Summary This snapshot of existing and emerging technologies diagnosing endothelial cell dysfunction is intended to provide the foundation for the future (a) development of personalized noninvasive screening of endothelial function, and (b) delineation of preclinical diagnostic biomarkers heralding cardiovascular complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available