4.6 Article

Cyclosporine withdrawal improves renal function in heart transplant patients on reduced-dose cyclosporine therapy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 2750-2758

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01527.x

Keywords

heart transplant patients; immunosuppression; rapamycin; renal function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Renal failure is a major cause of morbidity after heart transplantation. It is unclear whether calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) free immunosuppression provides more nephroprotection than low-dose CNI therapy. Thirty-nine patients with renal failure on low-dose cyclosporine A (CsA) were studied (62.9 +/- 8.7 years, five female, 8.2 +/- 4.3 years posttransplant, serum creatinine: 1.9 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, calculated GFR (cGFR): 48.2 +/- 18.3 mL/min, CsA C0 level: 64.0 +/- 19.9 ng/mL). All patients had been treated with low-dose CsA > 6 months, renal function was stable or slowly decreasing (creatinine 1.7-3.5 mg/dL). Nineteen patients were randomized to discontinuation of CsA and overlapping rapamycin therapy initiation (RAPA), 20 patients continued low-dose CsA (control). Three patients (16%) discontinued rapamycin medication for side effects (diarrhea, skin rash), two patients developed pneumonia and pulmonary embolism, respectively, no rejection or other infectious complications were seen. After 6 months, renal function in the control group was unchanged. In the RAPA group, renal function markedly improved (creatinine: 2.08 +/- 0.15 to 1.67 +/- 0.13 mg/dL, cGFR: 48.5 +/- 21.4 to 61.7 +/- 21.4 mL/min (p < 0.001 within and between groups)). In carefully selected late survivors following heart transplantion who are at low risk of rejection, CNI-free rapamycin-based immunosuppression improves cGFR even in those already receiving low-dose CsA therapy. The results of this study warrant further confirmation in larger clinical trials that are powered to assess clinical outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available