4.6 Review

Combining testosterone and PDE5 inhibitors in erectile dysfunction: Basic rationale and clinical evidences

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 940-947

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.049

Keywords

erectile dysfunction; phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5); PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is); hypogonadism; testosterone; ageing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and decline of testosterone levels are frequently observed with age and also in illnesses with a common basis of endothelial damage. Objectives: To review molecular mechanisms underlying androgen action upon its receptor and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) expression and regulation by testosterone in cavernous tissue and their clinical implication in the treatment of ED refractory to PDE5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is). Methods: From January 2003 to May 2005, we performed an extensive, unsystematic MEDLINE literature search reviewing relevant data on basic and clinical studies regarding the efficacy of combination therapies. Results: Most trials using testosterone alone for treatment of ED in hypogonadal men suffer from methodologic problems and report inconsistent results, but overall the trials suggest that testosterone is superior to placebo. Orally effective PDE5-Is, such as sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil, may be ineffective depending on the demonstration of testosterone regulation of PDE5 expression in human corpus cavernous, and their efficacy may be enhanced by testosterone adjunction whenever necessary. Conclusions: Screening for hypogonadism in all men with ED is necessary to identify men with severe hypogonadism and some cases of mild to moderate hypogonadism, who may benefit from testosterone treatment. Identification of threshold values for testosterone supplementation to appropriately benefit from PDE5-Is failure may improve clinical management of unresponsive patients with minimization of unwanted effects. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available