4.7 Article

Anidulafungin pharmacokinetics and microbial response in neutropenic mice with disseminated candidiasis

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 50, Issue 11, Pages 3695-3700

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00507-06

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Candidemia is often fatal, especially in patients with persistent neutropenia. New therapies are needed. We performed 24-h pharmacodynamic studies to compare the efficacies of anidulafungin, fluconazole, and amphotericin B in neutropenic mice with disseminated candidiasis caused by one of three strains of Candida glabrata. Anidulafungin produced a maximal fungal kill (E-max) of 1.4 to 1.9 log(10) CFU/g in kidneys and was not influenced by resistance to either fluconazole or amphotericin B. Fluconazole produced an E-max of 1.3 log(10) CFU/g in mice infected with fluconazole-susceptible C. glabrata, but the E-max was 0 for mice infected with a C. glabrata strain that had a fluconazole MIC of >= 32 mg/liter. Amphotericin B achieved an E-max of 4.2 log(10) CFU/g in mice infected with amphotericin B-susceptible C. glabrata, but the E-max was 0 for mice infected with a C. glabrata strain with an amphotericin B MIC of 2 mg/liter. In all instances, anidulafungin's maximal microbial kill was superior to that of fluconazole. Next, we performed a 96-h anidulafungin pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study. Anidulafungin exhibited delayed peak concentrations in kidneys compared to those in serum, after which the concentrations declined, with a serum terminal half-life of 21.6 (+/- 4.6) h. This was accompanied by a persistent 96-h decrease in the kidney fungal burden after treatment with a single anidulafungin dose of >= 8 mg/kg of body weight. This pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic picture of anidulafungin persistence in tissues and the resultant persistent fungal decline should be exploited to improve the efficacy of anidulafungin therapy for candidemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available