4.5 Article

Inhibition of spontaneous breast cancer metastasis by anti-Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen monoclonal antibody JAA-F11

Journal

NEOPLASIA
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 939-948

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1593/neo.06493

Keywords

breast carcinoma; metastasis; adhesion; monoclonal antibody; TF-Ag

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL078816, T32 HL07094, T32 HL007094] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R15 AI49210-01, R15 AI049210] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen (TF-Ag) is expressed in many carcinomas, including those of the breast, colon, bladder, and prostate. TF-Ag is important in adhesion and metastasis and as a potential immunotherapy target. We hypothesized that passive transfer of JAA-F11, an anti-TF-Ag monoclonal antibody, may create a survival advantage for patients with TF-Ag-expressing tumors by cytotoxicity, blocking of tumor cell adhesion, and inhibition of metastasis. This was tested using in vitro models of tumor cell growth; cytotoxicity assays; in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models of cancer metastasis; and, finally, in vivo effects in mice with metastatic breast cancer. Unlike some anti-TF-Ag antibodies, JAA-F11 did not enhance breast carcinoma cell growth. JAA-F11 did not induce the killing of 4T1 tumor cells through complement-dependent cytotoxicity or apoptotic mechanisms. However, JAA-F11 blocked the stages of metastasis that involve the adhesion of human breast carcinoma cells to human endothelial cells ( human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human bone marrow endothelial cells 60) in in vitro static adhesion models, in a perfused ex vivo model, and in murine lung vasculature in an in vivo metastatic deposit formation assay. JAA-F11 significantly extended the median survival time of animals bearing metastatic 4T1 breast tumors and caused a > 50% inhibition of lung metastasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available