4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 31, Pages 5034-5042

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3958

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The phase III Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial compared gefitinib with placebo in 1,692 patients with refractory advanced non - small-cell lung cancer. We analyzed ISEL tumor biopsy samples to examine relationships between biomarkers and clinical outcome after gefitinib treatment in a placebo-controlled setting. Methods Biomarkers included epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) gene copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization ( n = 370); EGFR ( n = 379) and phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) protein expression ( n = 382) by immunohistochemistry; and mutations in EGFR ( n = 215), KRAS ( n = 152), and BRAF ( n = 118). Results High EGFR gene copy number was a predictor of a gefitinib-related effect on survival ( hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 for high copy number and HR, 1.16 for low copy number; comparison of high v low copy number HR, P =.045). EGFR protein expression was also related to clinical outcome ( HR for positive, 0.77; HR for negative, 1.57; comparison of high v low protein expression HR, P =.049). Patients with EGFR mutations had higher response rates than patients without EGFR mutations (37.5% v 2.6%); there were insufficient data for survival analysis. No relationship was observed between p-Akt protein expression and survival outcome, and the limited amount of data collected for KRAS and BRAF mutations prevented any meaningful evaluation of clinical outcomes in relation to these mutations. Conclusion EGFR gene copy number was a predictor of clinical benefit from gefitinib in ISEL. Additional studies are warranted to assess these biomarkers fully for the identification of patients most likely to benefit from gefitinib treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available