4.4 Article

Intraindividual variation of amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with stable heart failure

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages 1248-1250

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.06.017

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate how large the variation between measurements of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) can be in patients with clinically stable heart failure (HF). The fluctuation of NT-pro-BNP in patients with HF has not been previously evaluated. Patients with chronic, stable HF were evaluated at 3-week intervals. The relative (percentage of baseline) difference between the 2 NT-pro-BNP measurements and their mean were calculated. In total, 118 double measurements of NT-pro-BNP were obtained. Changes in NT-pro-BNP measurements were determined according to quartiles of mean NT-pro-BNP. The median baseline NT-pro-BNP level was 1,323 pg/ml (25th and 75th percentiles 433 and 2,258), and the median second NT-pro-BNP level was 1,394 pg/ml (25th and 75th percentiles 475 and 2,353) (p = 0.34). Among pairs of measurements in the first quartile (NT-pro-BNP < 450 pg/ml), the 5th and 95th percentiles of the distribution of relative differences were -86% and +197%. In the second (450 to 1,300 pg/ml), third (1,300 to 2,300 pg/ml), and fourth (> 2,300 pg/ml) quartiles, the 5th and 95th percentiles of relative differences were -42% and +78%, -29% and +38%, and -30% and +37%, respectively, of the baseline values. In conclusion, the results support the clinical use of NT-pro-BNP in the monitoring of patients with HF with NT-pro-BNP levels > 1,300 pg/ml. In these patients, variations between 113 less and about 40% more can be expected without clinical improvement or deterioration. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available