4.2 Article

Additive effect of teratocyte and calyx fluid from Cotesia plutellae on immunosuppression of Plutella xylostella

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 341-347

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2006.00524.x

Keywords

calyx fluid; Cotesia plutellae; immunity; parasitoid; Plutella xylostella; teratocyte

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Teratocytes are cells that originate from the extra-embryonic tissues of some hymenopteran parasitoids, typically dissociate upon hatching, and develop in the host haemolymph. They are considered to be involved in parasitoid larval nutrient uptake, host immunosuppression and/or repression of competing parasitoid development. Teratocytes of the parasitoid, Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) are found in its natural host, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and can be cultured in vitro. The present study demonstrates that teratocytes of C. plutellae possess a significantly depressive effect on host cellular immunity. When the hosts are preinjected with 200 cultured teratocytes (corresponding to the normal number of teratocytes released during wasp hatching), haemocyte nodulation is inhibited by approximately 40%, with younger teratocytes being more potent than older ones. Similarly, the medium in which teratocytes are cultured has similar immunosuppressive properties. In comparison, calyx fluid extracted from the C. plutellae ovary also has an immunosuppressive effect on P. xylostella. These two maternal (calyx fluid) and embryonic (teratocytes) factors are additive and result in a reduced level of nodule formation equivalent to that induced by natural parasitization. However, the immunosuppression of the parasitized P. xylostella does not appear to be due to inhibition of phospholipase A(2), an immune mediator, because injection of arachidonic acid failed to restore haemocyte nodulation capability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available