4.7 Article

Cardiac catheterization and long-term chromosomal damage in children with congenital heart disease

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages 2703-2708

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl014

Keywords

congenital heart disease; cardiac catheterization; ionizing radiation; chromosomal damage; cancer risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Medical radiological exposure is associated with an additional risk of cancer. Children with repaired congenital heart disease (CHD) are theoretically at a relatively greater cancer risk as the radiological exposure can be intensive in these patients. Chromosomal aberrations test (CA) and micronucleus assay (MN) in peripheral blood lymphocytes are biomarkers of chromosomal damage and intermediate endpoints in carcinogenesis. Methods and results The frequency of CA and MN was assessed in three groups of patients: Group I, 32 exposed patients (17 males, age=15.5 +/- 8.3 years) who underwent cardiac procedures employing ionizing radiation (mostly cardiac catheterization) for CHD between 1965 and 2000; Group II, 32 healthy age- and sex-matched subjects (17 males, age=14.1 +/- 12.3 years), and Group III, 10 newborn non-exposed patients (7 males) with CHD. Exposed patients of Group I had a mean value of 2.9 +/- 1.4 cardiac catheterization (range 1-5) procedures per person. The mean frequency of CA was higher in the exposed patients (Group I=2.8 +/- 1.9% vs. Group II=0.7 +/- 0.7%; vs. Group III=0.8 +/- 0.8%; P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean values of MN were higher in the exposed patients (Group I =12.3 +/- 5.1 parts per thousand vs. Group II=6.0 +/- 3.8 parts per thousand; vs. Group III=4.4 +/- 1.4 parts per thousand; P < 0.0001). Conclusion Cardiac ionizing procedures are associated with a long-lasting mark in the chromosomal damage of exposed children with CHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available