4.5 Article

Niemann-Pick C disease in Spain:: Clinical spectrum and development of a disability scale

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 249, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.054

Keywords

Niemann Pick C; phenotype; clinical delineation; database and disability scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To describe the clinical evolution of Nietnann-Pick C disease to identify possible factors involved in the diagnosis and severity of the disease. Methods: A clinical database and a severity scale was created to evaluate 45 patients diagnosed with Niemann-Pick type C in the last 28 years in Spain. Results: Complete clinical data were obtained from 30 patients, all were confirmed to have mutations in the NPCI gene. Regarding clinical form, 3 were perinatal, 7 severe infantile, 6 late infantile, 11 juvenile and 3 adult. Biochemical phenotype was classic in 26. Splenomegaly was present in 28 patients (93%) with a wide range of age at detection. The first symptom of neurological disease was clumsiness, followed in 2-4 years by cerebellar signs. Ophthalmoplegia appeared 2-4 years later and became complete 1-2 years after onset. Dysarthria appeared by the time of complete ophthalmoplegia. Diagnosis was made before the onset of neurological signs in patients with the severe infantile form, at the time of onset of cerebellar signs in the late infantile form and complete ophthalmoplegia in late onset forms. Conclusions: In our series, splenomegaly is present in 96% of patients, even in late onset forms during the first years of life. Clumsiness in children with otherwise normal motor development precedes the onset of ataxia by 2-4 years in Niemann Pick type C. A disability scale could be useful for monitoring evolution, establishing possible phenotypic correlations and evaluating future therapies. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available