4.7 Article

Ochratoxin A and the occurrence of ochratoxin A-producing black aspergilli in stored peanut seeds from Cordoba, Argentina

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 86, Issue 14, Pages 2369-2373

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2625

Keywords

Aspergillus niger; Aspergillus carbonarius; peanut seeds; ochratoxin A

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since there is no available information about the natural occurrence of ochratoxin-producing fungi and ochratoxin A (OTA) in peanut seeds in Argentina, the aims of this work were to isolate and identify Aspergillus section Nigri and to evaluate the natural occurrence of OTA in stored peanut seeds. Likewise, the capacity to produce OTA by Aspergillus section Nigri was studied. Forty-seven samples of peanut seeds were obtained from a storage plant in the south of Cordoba Province, Argentina. Each sample of 100 seeds was surface-disinfected and plated onto a dichloran 18% glycerol agar (DG18). OTA was detected by HPLC. The production of OTA in strains belonging to section Nigri was tested in YES medium (2% yeast extract, 15% sucrose). Aspergillus spp., the most frequent mould, occurred in 100% of samples, followed by Penicillium spp. (87%) and Eurotium spp. (6.4%). A. flavus was isolated in 100% of the samples, followed by A. niger var. niger, A. niger var. awamori and A. carbonarius at a lower frequency, 89%, 68% and 4%, respectively. OTA was found in 32% of the peanut seed samples, with mean levels ranging from 0.5 to 170 ng g(-1). The mean recovery of the method used was 85 +/- 2%. Forty-three isolates (27%) of Aspergillus section Nigri, were found to be OTA producing strains. The highest percentage of ochratoxigenic strains (57%) was found within the A. carbonarius ssp. These results indicate a human exposure to OTA in Argentina through the ingestion of peanut seeds and peanut products. (c) 2006 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available