4.4 Article

Improvement of cyclic decapeptides against plant pathogenic bacteria using a combinatorial chemistry approach

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 2575-2584

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2006.05.001

Keywords

antibacterial activity; eukaryotic cytotoxicity; fire blight; combinatorial chemistry; cyclic peptides; design of experiments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclic decapeptides were developed based on the previously reported peptide c(LysLeuLysLeuLysPheLysLeuLysGln). These compounds were active against the economically important plant pathogenic bacteria Erwinia amylovora, Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas vesicatoria. A library of 56 cyclic decapeptides was prepared and screened for antibacterial activity and eukaryotic cytotoxicity, and led to the identification of peptides with improved minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against P. syringae (3.1-6.2 mu M) and X. vesicatoria (1.6-3.1 mu M). Notably, peptides active against E. amylovora (MIC of 12.5-25 mu M) were found, constituting the first report of cyclic peptides with activity towards this bacteria. A second library based on the structure c(X(1)X(2)X(3)X(4)LysPheLysLysLeuGln) with X being Lys or Leu yielded peptides with optimized activity profiles. The activity against E. amylovora was further improved (MIC of 6.2-12.5 mu M) and the best peptides displayed a low eukaryotic cytotoxicity at concentrations 30-120 times higher than the MIC values. A design of experiments permitted to define rules for high antibacterial activity and low cytotoxicity, being the main rule X-2 not equal X-3, and the secondary rule X-4 = Lys. The best analogs can be considered as good candidates for the development of effective antibacterial agents for use in plant protection. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available